One half of Willy and Max’s Single Shares will be conditional.
They will get a half share in the beginning, and I will mete out the other half from a trust agreement (or other legal agreement) if some conditions are met.
That’s all I want out of the piece.
And I am willing to get by with 2 if need be.
Under 2 shares, and—>
My morale suffers because I think I am getting screwed…
assuming 2 original heroes in San Francisco on April 9th 2012,
I think each of them and Mark J should get 2 shares each.
Sixteen minus SIX equals 10.
Ten Shares for Automattic folks in any way that they see as fair and appropriate.
[I Suggest that U See Rose. “Rose knows.” She probably knows what to do here, and so does Matt.]
That’s my Initial Thinking on this.
What do you think?
What would U do different, and Why?
Feel Free to Leave a Comment on this.
ADOGG aka Allen D
Smile! You’re at the best WordPress.com site ever
ADOGG’s FEB12 THINKING In Regard 2 Our 49% iROCK Shares And How To Chop Them Up (2-12-14)
DOING THE MATH IN REGARD TO STOCK SUBTRACTION (as per material below) Leaves 16 Shares Left.
Rather than me pitch all of you WordPress folks on an answer, when I really don’t know beans other than in regard to Mark J, why don’t you WordPress folks come up with your own equitable split of these 16 shares?
Even though I had a 50/50 split with Google in an initial iCollaborative Business Agreement, I INTENTIONALLY GAVE THEM CONTROL OF iRock by giving them 51%.
It would not be fair to Google and/or a Google/Facebook Venture Capital combo to have less than 51%.
The Money Man (or Money Men if Google and Facebook split…
View original post 1,334 more words